DUBLIN ā Dublin City Council is facing mounting pressure and a complex legal dilemma over the proliferation of Irish tricolour flags being erected across the city by groups associated with anti-immigration sentiment. While some councillors and residents view the flags as a deliberate act of “weaponisation” and “territory marking” aimed at intimidating immigrant communities, the Council has indicated it will not move for immediate removal, citing the sensitive nature of the national flag.
Council Chief Executive Richard Shakespeare stated the local authority is taking the issue “seriously” but that it is a “sensitive issue which requires a considered response from all stakeholders” and a comprehensive risk assessment. Officials are scheduled to meet with senior GardaĆ (Irish police) representatives to discuss the situation, which is complicated by the fact there are no specific, easily enforceable rules regarding the flying of the national flag in the Dublin area.
‘Weaponisation’ vs. National Symbol
The flags, often hung on lamp posts without official permission, have appeared in areas like Finglas, Coolock, and the North and South Inner City, mirroring similar campaigns by far-right groups in the UK.
- Concerns: Labour Councillor Darragh Moriarty is among those who have sought clarity, arguing the flags are being erected with “hateful intent” to “intimidate and harass people who arenāt Irish.”
- Defence: Conversely, those involved in the movement, including some Independent councillors, argue they are simply “reclaiming” the national flag and expressing patriotic pride. Independent Ireland TD Ken OāFlynn accused the Council of “overreaching” and trying to “brand the tricolour as anti-immigrant.”
Stumbling Blocks
One of the significant challenges facing the Council is the reported intimidation of workers tasked with removing the bunting. Videos allegedly posted by far-right activists have shown attempts to discourage council subcontractors from taking the flags down.
For now, the Council appears to be adopting a cautious approach, prioritising consultation with law enforcement and community groups before making a definitive decision on any mass removal, highlighting the legal and safety complexities of intervening against what is officially the national flag.






